19th Century French Fishery
The French Revolution and the wars of the Napoleonic empire brought about an interruption in the French fishery in Newfoundland. But peace finally arrived in 1815, and the French regained all the rights that they had previously enjoyed; the situation reverted to what it had been in 1792. The French islands of St-Pierre and Miquelon, from which the French had been forced out, were returned to them.
The Bank Fishery & The Sedentary Fishery
As in the past, the French fishery was divided into two parts, the bank fishery, and the sedentary fishery.
Ships engaging in the banks fishery left France in the early spring for St-Pierre, where they took on provisions, especially of bait, and went to fish on the Grand Banks. Sometimes they returned to St-Pierre to unload their catch for drying on shore, take on more supplies, and go fishing again. Less frequently, the fish would be salted on board as soon as it was caught on the Banks. At the end of the season, the catch was taken to France or exported.
Ships engaging in the sedentary fishery left France at about the same time and travelled to the coast of Newfoundland, where they anchored for the summer. Fishing was carried on with small boats close to shore, and the catch was dried on shore as soon as it was caught. At the end of the season it was loaded on board the ship, which then returned to France or exported the fish elsewhere.
Local Settlers and the French
While the rights enjoyed by France after 1815 were theoretically the same as in 1792, in fact the situation on shore had changed considerably. Substantial settlement had taken place on the island of Newfoundland, including the area between Cape St. John and Cape Ray where French rights were in effect. The French objected particularly to the growth of west coast communities such as St. Georges and Codroy, and to the spreading of settlers along the northeast coast. Competition between local settlers and the French was to continue for the rest of the century, despite frequent attempts to settle differences by diplomacy.
An example was the proposed Convention of 1857 between Britain and France, which would have recognized the existence of a number of English communities along the treaty shore and compensated France for their loss by opening up the coast of Labrador to them.
But this situation was refused by Newfoundland, and it never went into effect. Throughout the century the French maintained that the English had no right to fish at all on the treaty shore, while the English claimed that they could do so as long as they did not interfere with the French. In many places the French employed English caretakers to look after their premises during their absence in the winter. These caretakers had families, their children began to have families, and so the problem continued.
The French government paid shipowners a subsidy or bounty for taking their crew to Newfoundland; this provided a supply of men trained on board sailing ships who could be recruited into the navy in times of war. Newfoundland merchants complained that, while the French merchants were their competitors on world markets, Newfoundlanders had no such preferential financial treatment.
This continued to be an irritant. At the same time, technology was changing: by the middle of the century naval ships were powered by steam, and the need for having a pool of seamen for sailing ships was fast disappearing. But the subsidies remained in effect.
Later in the century, especially in the 1880s, the lobster fishery became another subject of diplomatic dispute. English settlers or merchants had set up lobster factories for canning the shellfish, and the French vigorously protested. They claimed that these lobster factories interfered with the French cod fishery by taking up prime space along the shoreline and polluting the water with waste. The French also set up lobster factories, and the English claimed that they had no right to do so, since all they were entitled to do was to catch and dry fish, and that lobster is not a fish.
Another irritant was Newfoundland's Bait Act of 1887, which prohibited the export of bait. This was aimed at the sale of bait (fresh caplin or herring) caught in Newfoundland by Newfoundlanders and then sold to French fishing ships. The French had the option of using salt bait that they could bring with them from France, but it was never found to be as effective. But necessity is the mother of invention, and when the supply of caplin or herring was cut off, French fishermen discovered that the whelk, a small shellfish plentiful on the Grand Banks, was another excellent bait, and this they could fish themselves.
The Entente Cordiale
While English settlement on the treaty shore continued to grow, the number of French ships involved in the Newfoundland sedentary fishery declined dramatically in the second half of the century. By the 1890s only a handful of ships remained, although the Banks fishery was still very active. The situation was ripe for a negotiated final settlement, and in 1904 the various levels of government agreed to the entente cordiale, under which France gave up all rights to the shores of Newfoundland, while retaining the islands of St-Pierre and Miquelon and the right to fish in Newfoundland waters.