|
 |
A. Shea's Pro-Confederate Speech, 1865
Extracts from Speech by A. Shea (Liberal, District of Placentia-St.
Mary's), Assembly Debate 9, February 21, 1865. The Newfoundlander, March 2, 1865.
... This measure of Confederation does not belong to the class of untried or
novel experiments. All the principal countries of the world are the result of
combinations of small states for the purposes of defence, security, and common
advancement.... The Union of England and Ireland have been referred to as an
example of the injurious effects of combination, and efforts had been made to
work on the traditional prejudice which that event had justly inspired, to
create a hostile feeling to the present measure. They have read the-history
of that transaction to little purpose who assert that it has any features in
common with the just terms on which the Confederation of these Colonies is
proposed to be formed.... It were idle to enumerate the inequalities and
injustice which-marked this connexion [between Ireland and England] which
scarcely established any bond but that which exists between the taskmaster
and the slave.... What analagy [sic] then ... can be drawn between a Union
such as I have correctly described, and the proposed combination of these
British North American Provinces where the just rights of all are alike
respected, and the conditions of honourable partnership upheld.... Now,
if ever a country was so placed as to require the aid of others, it is this
colony. With a population of but 13,000 scattered over many hundred miles of
sea coast our condition manifestly points to the necessity of co-operation
with others whose alliance will give which in our isolated state we cannot
attain. We have proved our want of power to effect any object above the
ordinary routine. We have seen pauperism setting us at defiance, and all
our necessarily feeble efforts have been futile for its correction. We have
resources fully adequate to the support of the population, and they remain
idle from our inability to place them within the reach of the people, whose
condition loudly calls for increased employment. In this position of affairs
we present a strong case for the necessity of combination with those-who have
the power to aid us, and whose interest it would be to promote our
prosperity.... The [Imperial] Government feel that the combination of
these Provinces is the condition alone on which they can be upheld in
connexion with the mother country, and ln view of all the considerations
that surround this grave question, shall we be told it must be dealt with
by regard to its effects in adding a half-penny a yard to the price of calico.
Can we doubt that the proposed Confederation is the expression of the settled
views of British policy, and we may be thankful that when its advent is inevitable,
the arrangement itself is one that has the approving testimony of experience ...
But he had heard the strange argument advanced, that if we in this colony refuse
to unite we shall become a pet Province and the seat of a Naval Station.... [I]t
was somewhat novel to find reward waiting on those who pursued a course of
senseless contumacy and resistance. Will our refusal to confederate make Halifax
less eligible than before in point of geographical position? .... We deceive
ourselves in supposing that we have any value in the eyes of Great Britain that
would induce a favourable exceptional policy in our case. It is not with us now
as in times of old, when this colony was a nursery for seamen.... England has now
no need of us in that respect.... But it is asserted that the British Government
never intended that this island should form part of however; is clear on this
point against those who offer this objection...

|
|
 |
|