The Beothuk traditionally used bow and arrows for hunting mammals
and birds and in skirmishes with their foes. In the early 1600s
they had wooden shields to protect them from enemy missiles. Bows
were about 1.5 m long and were made from pieces of mountain ash,
spruce or pine. They were strung with plaited or twisted deerskin.
Arrows about 90 cm long were fletched with two strips of feathers and
fitted with stone and later with iron points. They were carried in
birchbark quivers. The Beothuk were very skilled in the use of
these weapons. It was said that they would arrange five or six
arrows between the fingers and then shoot them off, one after the
other, with great rapidity and unerring aim.
|
Bow, two arrows with iron points, and two birchbark quivers.
The drawing was part of the title to John Cartwright's map of the Exploits River, 1773.
Courtesy of the National Archives of Canada/NMC 27.
(42 kb)
|
For their annual caribou drive the Beothuk built fence works along
river banks or at lakes to obstruct the migration routes of herds.
In fall, large numbers of caribou migrated from the Northern
Peninsula southwards across the Exploits River and Red Indian Lake.
Once a herd is on the move, the herd stubbornly follows the lead
animals. If such leaders can be driven into a fence-trap or towards
narrow exits in the fences, the rest of the herd will follow.
In 1768 John Cartwright, who travelled along the Exploits River,
described the fences as consisting of felled trees that had been
left hanging on the stump; every freshly cut tree was made to fall
on the previous one. To make the fences impenetrable, weak spots
were filled with branches or were secured by large stakes and
bindings. Where there were no trees, the Beothuk drove 2 m sticks
into the ground at an angle and tied birchbark strips to the tops.
The movement of the bark strips in the wind and the sound of their
striking against each other frightened the caribou and kept them
from passing between the sticks.
Above: Trees cut to form a fence.
Reproduced by permission of Ingeborg Marshall.
|
Left: Sticks with birchbark strips dangling from the top.
The drawing was part of John Cartwright's map of the Exploits River, 1773.
Courtesy of the National Archives of Canada/NMC 27.
(37 kb)
|
Most of the fences ran parallel to the river, but some had leads
extending into the forest to funnel the animals towards narrow
exits by the water, where hunters in canoes would await them. In
1768 fences in the area of Bishop's Falls and Grand Falls extended
more than 15 km. In the early 1800s, they ran along both sides of
the river from Badger to Red Indian Lake and were estimated at
about 50 km.
The major tool for hunting caribou was a spear - called amina. It
consisted of a 3 m wooden shaft, tipped with a slender, nearly
triangular iron point. Originally the spears would have had stone
or bone points.
Other furbearers were shot with arrows or caught in snares,
deadfalls or traps. Beaver may have been harpooned. While many
North American native people kept dogs to assist in hunting, the
Beothuk appear not to have had dogs.
For hunting seals the Beothuk used a special sealing harpoon -
called a-a-duth. It consisted of a 3.7 m shaft with a detachable
head tied to a long line. Formerly, the head was fitted with a
stone blade; later they made blades from iron. When a seal was
harpooned and the head was embedded in the animal, the shaft was
withdrawn and the seal was hauled in by the line.
Above: Shanawdithit's sketch showing a spear and a
sealing harpoon.
From James P. Howley, The Beothuks or Red Indians: the
Aboriginal Inhabitants of Newfoundland (Cambridge: University
Press, 1915) following 248.
(9 kb)
|
Left: Sealing harpoon head.
Courtesy of the Newfoundland Museum, St. John's,
Newfoundland.
(12 kb)
|
Fish, particularly salmon, were probably speared. It is possible
that the Beothuk also constructed fish weirs, used fish hooks or
fished with netting made from rushes or reeds. While the captive
Shanawdithit reported that her people considered it the greatest
good luck to kill a whale, she did not disclose how they secured
such large marine mammals.
The Beothuk also had clubs, knife blades hafted to handles, and
perforating tools made from beaver incisors, stone splinters and,
in historic times, from nails or pieces of broken glass. Many
additional implements or working aids were created from pieces of
wood, bark, sticks, roots and shell. Although such tools were
simple, they were highly functional.
Important components of the Beothuk's strategy for providing food
were their methods of preservation. They cut some of the meat into
strips and dried or smoked it to prevent spoiling. In this form it
was easy to carry and could be eaten without further preparation.
If there were large amounts of surplus meat (for example, after a
caribou drive), the meat was divested of bones and packaged into
bark boxes, each box containing about 75 to 100 kg, and kept in
special store-houses. Once the meat was frozen it would keep for
the winter.
|
Shanawdithit's sketch of a store-house.
From James P. Howley, The Beothuks or Red Indians: the
Aboriginal Inhabitants of Newfoundland (Cambridge: University
Press, 1915) following 248.
(18 kb)
|
Shanawdithit's sketch of a smoking house.
From James P. Howley, The Beothuks or Red Indians: the
Aboriginal Inhabitants of Newfoundland (Cambridge: University
Press, 1915) following 248.
(19 kb)
|
|
The Beothuk rendered caribou fat into clear grease and stored it in
birchbark containers; seal blubber was heated to produce oil and
kept in seal or caribou bladders. Lobster tails and salmon were
dried, bird's eggs were boiled and dried or mixed with other
ingredients and then dried in the sun. The Beothuk also made a kind
of pudding or sausage that they stuffed into animal
intestines.
|
Shanawdithit's sketch, “Different kinds of Animal food.”
From James P. Howley, The Beothuks or Red Indians: the
Aboriginal Inhabitants of Newfoundland (Cambridge: University
Press, 1915) following 246.
(42 kb)
|
Cooking was usually done over an open fire, either in a mamateek or
outdoors. The Beothuk lit a fire by striking two pieces of iron
pyrite together to produce sparks that would ignite bird down or
other easily inflammable matter. They roasted large pieces of meat
on a spit, and placed smaller pieces on sticks around the cooking
fire. Fowl and other food items were cooked in birchbark
containers. Some of the bark pots were large enough to hold several
birds the size of ducks. First the water was brought to a boil by
placing heated rocks into the pot and then food was added. More hot
stones kept the contents of the pot boiling. This method was
relatively cumbersome and it is not surprising that the Beothuk
readily adopted European kettles and pots.
|
Shanawdithit's sketch of different types of bark containers.
From James P. Howley, The Beothuks or Red Indians: the
Aboriginal Inhabitants of Newfoundland (Cambridge: University
Press, 1915) following 248.
(32 kb)
|
Four bark dishes.
Courtesy of the Newfoundland Museum, St. John's, Newfoundland.
(19 kb)
|
|
The Beothuk made a variety of vessels for cooking and storage from
birchbark. Simple cups were folded from a rectangular piece of bark
and then sewn together at the upper edge with split roots. More
elaborate dishes were produced from a sheet of bark that had been
cut into a specific template or preform. After it was folded into
the desired shape the seams were stitched. Some bark dishes had
pinked edges or were decorated with chevron designs.
©1998, Ingeborg Marshall
on behalf of the Beothuk Institute.
[Based on Ingeborg Marshall, A History and Ethnography of the Beothuk (Montreal: McGill-Queen's
University Press, ©1996).]